|  What's 
          wrong with this picture? No, I mean really: is there anything ambiguous 
          about the image gazing fondly at you from the top of this page? I ask 
          because I am receiving too many letters and e-mails with the salutation, 
          "Dear Sir." Lovely letters, mostly, a few complaints, but all with this 
          rather worrying common element. Perhaps people simply whiz past this 
          page in their hurry to get to the fabulous features. Hmm.
 In our cover story, Patrick McDonagh looks at the value of a liberal 
          arts education. To B.A. or not to B.A.? has been asked before. McGill 
          Principal F. Cyril James wrote a piece for a 1950 issue of the News 
          about McGill's direction until the year 2000. In it, he reported that 
          the "total free revenues" of the University had gone to the faculties 
          of Agriculture, Medicine and Engineering in the previous year. Graduates 
          of these faculties were "vitally important to the welfare and prosperity" 
          of post-war Canada, wrote James. He called for the federal government 
          "to finance on a generous scale the professional training by universities 
          of physicians, surgeons, engineers, agriculturalists and forestry specialists." 
          Without such help, there would be precious little funding for the arts. 
         Today, there are similar pressures to train people in particular fields 
          and similar threats to arts faculties. The world's healthiest economies 
          have become what Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve 
          Board, calls "conceptual-based" and are driven by "the most conceptual 
          and impalpable of all new major products Ð software." Greenspan's remarks 
          were part of a speech before the American Council on Education in which 
          he urged universities "to struggle to prevent the liberal arts curricula 
          from being swamped by technology and science." 
         In a New York Times article last year, author and software engineer 
          Ellen Ullman wrote about early computer programmers like herself, who 
          came to computing as a third or fourth vocation, frequently with more 
          than one degree in the humanities. "We had all taught ourselves computing. 
          What we knew was how to learn, which is all that one can hang on to 
          in a profession in which change is relentless." She sees little merit 
          in narrow computer science programs since the 'latest' skills become 
          obsolete so quickly. Instead, she wants computer programmers to also 
          study history, languages, literature and philosophy. "Programmers seem 
          to be changing the world," writes Ullman. "It would be a relief, for 
          them and for all of us, if they knew something about it." 
         Since Cyril James's day, of course, government has stepped in to fund 
          universities, changing a measure which once put McGill first in the 
          country. "Our fees have been, and are likely to remain, the highest 
          in Canada," predicted James, but universities no longer set their own 
          fees, and Quebec students now pay the lowest tuition. The problems that 
          has created for McGill are highlighted in this issue's special section, 
          "New Faces, Changing Times," which outlines how the University has dealt 
          with this decade's huge budget cuts, and how it is reshaping for the 
          long term. 
         The more immediate future is the preoccupation of many organizations 
          right now as the end of the century approaches. The U.S. government 
          has announced that it will print an extra $50 billion in case of a run 
          on banks as people fear some catastrophic Y2K computer glitch will evaporate 
          their savings. In Canada, the RCMP and the military cancelled leaves 
          of all personnel for the year end in order to cope with possible disruptions 
          to the public order. Who says we're not different countries? 
         Last fall, the Alumni Association travel program offered a trip to 
          Rome for a week's stay at a luxury hotel as a way to greet the new millennium. 
          (I don't need to hear from the 2001 people Ð you may be right but you're 
          outnumbered.) The New Year package included a mass with the Pope, a 
          night at the opera, a private tour of St. Peter's, a side trip to Florence, 
          and wine with everything. There were no takers. Sure, the sticker price 
          was a little high, but none of us is going to see this occasion again. 
         So if you're not going to Rome, what are you planning for the big night? 
          Will you be hunkered down in the basement surrounded by crates of food, 
          wading into a fistfight at the ATM, or waiting it out in Bora Bora? 
          If you have plans, let us hear from you. We'll publish your letters 
          in our December issue and award prizes for the best entries. Mark your 
          envelope "millennium" or put it in the subject line of your e-mail. 
          Oh, and please begin your message, "Dear Editor." Thanks. 
            |